Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
真不知道这个电影到底想要讲什么，垃圾故事。MaggieQ依旧美艳，身手矫捷，只是不断的遭虐！
真是难看，动作戏是设计出来的，不是打出来的。
谢谢模式的电影拍了这么多年你们不腻我都腻了。Maggie Q还是那么美，就不能换个头发多点的魅力男士配她？
全剧最多的就是废话，动作戏不够干脆，吊胃口，剧情拖沓，没有一点代入感，故事情节交代不清楚，真的是浪费时间。
这剧情也太对不起这cast了吧……Maggie Q的演技怎么好像弱了……
6.0/10 分。初看，蓝光。老式的动作片，有点像吕克·贝松1990年的《女囚尼基塔》。。。放到三十年前还算可以，放到今天实在老套了点。适合看片少的新人。。娱乐性还不如旧瓶装新酒的《安娜》。。。另外，刚好顺便一起看了同期的《火药奶昔》，也是女人杀手的，全是现在的女权主义潮流。那个更逗比，逻辑性更差，纯粹可以当喜剧来看，呵呵。
最后迈克尔基顿是去送的么.中间的床戏理解不能,哪里来的感情基础啊
如果不是那场干柴烈火的“动作戏”，那么就值一星
这个结局也挺无语的，基顿一点本事没在身上是吧，这还能被打败我真的不相信，大概率是双方都没开枪，那问题是，这一百分钟导演说了个什么呢？
这片子也太粗糙了，除了动作好看之外，其他真的是莫名其妙，男主太油腻了，yue-
流水线作品 演员和导演都受制于剧本和人物本身的问题 几场比较干净的动作戏勉强可看
动作场面精彩，铺垫到位，不突兀。Samuel Jackson说Richard Wenk写的台词真是再好不过了。剧本唯一的不足是反派人物不够扎实强大，儿子那段戏也显得牵强。但不影响作为商业动作片的娱乐价值。
佐罗，007，龙叔，李美琪。超级英雄的尽头是东方女性（doge）
我的天呐，懵懵的看完，完全不知道讲了个啥。
男主为什么找老头？？难怪女主最后杀了他。气死老娘了嘤嘤嘤嘤嘤！
讲了100多分钟的玄学故事，就是不把越战遗产主题给点明。我有时很疑惑，这些不算差的技术团队围着一个装腔作势、不知所云的本子转几个月，是为了洗钱吗？这是温克认真写出来的本子吗？还是将写在便签上的零散创意拼出来的本子？
以前007没有这帮JW班底的时候，坎贝尔也拍的很暴力，在故事上也一股凶猛的气势。现在有了这班底之后，拍的更有味道了。不过，动作都还是太动作了；每个人都拿着一样的道具敲人、打的都是一样的拳术，没什么角色的个人特色。
能看，身材真好，可惜当年陈老师的流出没有她啊！
电影多少有点模仿史密斯夫妇的意思，俩人对决那来来回回就对到床上了。影片里一众老戏骨，显得李美琪还是那么年轻，虽然应该也40大几了，在里面完全看不出来，是最年轻的。反派都有点弱鸡，水平不咋样，吹牛逼第一名，男主不应该算是个叛徒吗？最后的枪声给了悬念，从身影上看是女的出来了，怎么说呢，前半程挺利落的特工片，后半程有点扯淡。最喜欢她的书店，是真的喜欢
除了MaggieQ的超模身材记不住任何 剧情就很离奇
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
