Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
有西部片的感觉，尤其是用锯断枪管的枪一枪崩一个，到处都是残肢血浆，又是毡帽又是卷烟的，好像被解救的姜戈啊。再就是老范用的是偏胶东腔的山东话，并不是枣庄风味啊，不过老范演的挺好的。
太过普通，但还是会落泪，最好看的还是范伟。
人物塑造还行，人物感情基本没有，英雄气概也没表现出来。色调本来是我喜欢的，但是导演这拍法我确实有点看不懂，感觉无聊
导演绝对是天赋型选手 这个质感纯靠技法拍不出来
看预告片怎么有种悬崖之上的感觉，看完之后感觉还是导演差距太大了，过年的狙击手应该不错
和《悬崖之上》一样，胜在氛围，败在脱离史实。铁道游击队炸铁道、发动群众的历史不见了，那么少的队员去强攻有日军驻守的火车？不尊重对手的战斗力，就是蔑视英雄们付出的血泪
有西部片的感觉，尤其是用锯断枪管的枪一枪崩一个，到处都是残肢血浆，又是毡帽又是卷烟的，好像被解救的姜戈啊。再就是老范用的是偏胶东腔的山东话，并不是枣庄风味啊，不过老范演的挺好的。
演员和美术道具可以，导演剧本摄影剪辑都差点意思，彪哥手雷那段高光，不愧是后世辽北第一猛人。游击队的故事本来是最富戏剧性和场景丰富性的，南斯拉夫的《瓦尔特保卫萨拉热窝》，《桥》。
一场给自己没事找事的逃票 结果哪个都没看好
范伟演技真是封神了，每次看都觉得电影界欠他一个终身成就奖，实在是相当流畅自然，一出现就让人挪不开眼。本以为张涵予是武，范伟是文，没想到看到最后范伟是文武双全，被捕时刻的笑容超绝——无谓、释然、讥讽、自得，太多可解读的情绪。本身都笼罩在大雪之中，制作优良，还原扎实，给老故事增添了新色彩。
片头幻灯片的背景介绍仿佛是大家常规主旋律汇报ppt。影片会感觉铺垫过久，意图是好的，但没做好。关键铺垫的点都没铺垫上，在矛盾的推进过程中基本就重复推进，主线人物劫车，反派布防，各走各的线，只是时间在推进，铺垫的的生涩，导演的意图是很好的，但功力不太够。在塑造人物方面，主人公像是在执行任务的工具人，而不是活灵活现的人，生活细节并没有让撑起人物的性格，导致主线人物功能性占比过大，人物缺少灵魂。场景的风格和故事也不太搭，有些风格化过度了，例如火车站的风雪场景，有点奇幻了，这样让故事仿佛是发生在一个特定虚构场景。有点可惜范老师的表演了，很多人物的戏剧动作都让人物减分了。类型片不见得要把人物类型到脸谱化，好的类型片人物一定都是“活”的。导演继续努力。
前面铺垫那么长……我还以为后面有什么惊喜……而惊喜就是电影终于快结束了……
106分钟19秒 23.976fps 流媒体WEB 复古影像，拍黄片结果变成恐怖片
质感很可以，色调我也很喜欢。但是故事不咋地，太平了
西方电影要达到深刻就必须要和宗教、性、血腥与变态者产生联系，这部电影仍在窠臼之内。四个女人，代表女性不同的阶段，对于性的看法，性爱分离、及时行乐、满足欲望等等看法，就是思想迷离的象征。上世纪的六七十年，西方年轻人来过一波，在疫情之下，西方年轻人估计也继续躺平，但是，曾经那个年代的美西方年轻人对于推动平权发挥了作用。放在当今，被资本收编的放纵已缺失青年向上的利理想与动力。
其实全片最感动的段落是教导员在车窗上画出党旗的那一刻，无论身处何地，党和人民都在心中。最后老洪扣上帽子，安静的等待着死亡，他知道他的死换来的是前线几十万将士的命，是中华民族的希望
没想到有一天眼泪会给范伟，演的太好了！！扔手雷那下，简直是谢霆锋！！！
整体就一般，不功不过的抗日战争电影，有些不知名小演员演技倒是可圈可点，其余都属于正常发挥，范伟老师求求多演点戏，演技太好了
【2.0】又俗又无聊，也就靠jump scare吓吓人。
故事可以，拍的不好，五毛钱特效大幅减分，一看就是大量用绿幕拍的吧，说不好听就是没诚意。如果把谍战元素搞的好一些，特高课别高开低走，有pk感就好了。现在是反派出场很高调，实际表现很拉垮啊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
