Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
《捕蛇者说》。
3.这种电影看的真的难受，因为电影里的问题是真实存在并且还将一直存在.
太惨了，即便是几条狗被这样打，看着都会无比难受。整体而言渲染的痕迹有些重，反而导致冲击力下降。
根据真实事件改编这句话里承载了太多太多。
很多人都在马拉松那段看哭，确实很热血，说出了不少人的心声。
三观超正，又很中二，节奏还很不错！小新用屁股想都知道的，你却不知道！
误杀3有了，印度政府怎么放任这些辱印电影全世界传播？
拍的不咋滴，牛逼的是没有跳舞，理解不了为什么三哥什么电影都能用那种歌曲转场，就像理解不了他们说话为啥总要晃头。内容的尺度很大，这在我们这儿是无法上映的。
出乎意料的不错！热血，青春，感动，反内卷反内耗，卷到最后才发现错过了青春其他精彩的东西
本该扫除罪恶的人却制造罪恶，是罪恶中之最。
教科书结构，但比例拿捏前部分稍微长了一点点。整体表现手法相当克制，配乐很少，运镜也简单，但综合起来却达到了一种老相片在暗房冲洗逐渐曝光的过程。剧力的坚实基础和故事看似平铺直叙但暗藏转折的讲法，再加上配角出彩演绎，并没有让人物沦为事件的脸谱，特别是几个反派，镜头不多，却各有特色。
分值第一的33男高处不胜寒，追逐分数的风间希望有人陪着自己一起往前...一味的独自向前的话，迷失时身边也没人能伸出援手。努力很重要，但更重要的是不要忘记自己为什么要努力。风间努力是为了和新酱在一起，真是一段孽缘啊w。
好人和坏人泾渭分明……不过四星还是给比姆拉奥律师
20220118le。机翻字幕严重影响观影。这样的社会题材比较容易拿高分，就电影本身来说只能算是合格吧。3.5
“我做错了什么？” “你生来有罪。”
原本看着评分很高，但也做好了失望的准备，却是一个大大大惊喜！熟悉的味道回来了！美伢和正南真的笑死了，马拉松时发问青春的那一段真的被打动到了。青春有阳光也有阴暗，当月潮可以对狰狞的自己说我超爱自己的时候，眼泪就开始哗哗哗停不住了，只有当世界不只有一种评判维度，才是幸福的根源。还是爱蜡笔小新。
满怀热情和希望，观影2小时40分钟，虽然有虐的部分，但结局很圆满，正义得到了伸张，朕心甚安。他们有不计报酬，只为正义而战的律师，有不出卖良心，秉公调查案件的警察，更重要的有公平执法的法官，何其幸运。据说这是一部真实事件背景的影片，禁不住琢磨，如果换一块土壤，结局还会是如此吗？
印度 Police 的黑暗执法，尤其是虐人的过程，太震撼人心，绝对是所有正规电影之中最惨无人道的视觉呈现...
很不错！是青春啊！番长好帅( ⁼̴̀ .̫ ⁼̴́ )✧
豆瓣评分虚高的片子里很多都符合几大因素：外国片，鸡汤多，少数群体，白左等 占两个就可以无脑五星。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
