A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
跟着男主在帮派中的演变看待帮派的演变。旁观来看，现实只能冷血。
当然了，影片还有很多隐喻之类的，但我最关心的还是上面三个细枝末节。
小绿魔杀了格温，导致加菲久久无法从悲痛中走出来。
从马仔经历种种磨难，杀出重围，终于成就黑社会老大，却好似失去了一切意义！
小女孩挺好看的 有被鸟人恶心到一点...中间我还以为它把邻居那个女孩的皮扒下来套自己身上了 剧情没什么新意
就没见过那个黑帮，像男主这样，动不动就双眼湿润……用力过猛
虚假的外衣，最终无法逃脱人性觉醒时的审判，故事看似不符合逻辑，但却感到异常真实。他的痛苦之处，也许就在于深刻的知道自己生活在自己的骗局中，却无法自拔。
以为会很无聊，其实拍得还可以，有点像童话故事～
自己神操作点错资源下载，看了十几分钟才发现在看恐怖片，受国内恐怖片的摧残，误会这只"鸟"是小女孩的幻想，最终走向经神病系列结局，事实并不是...
有一点点失望，感觉被高估了。当一个男人的最想守护的信念崩塌以后会变得冷酷无情，浓浓的悲情色彩，要是过程中逻辑更严谨一些就好了。
应该是一个分裂人格，善与恶的描述，鸟人就是女孩内心恶的化身，但是没太讲清楚缘由，感觉像没讲完似的
因为期待值过低，所以比预想要略好，起码能坚持看完。本以为会特别烂，不过比烂略强。当然，确实是很平庸，就是特别老套和土气的故事，故事也比较简单随意，好像90年代的那种B级片的剧情，当然，尺度又不是B级的。
这孩子瞅着真让人着急，真TM缺打。3.5星。这外国人遇到什么事儿都他妈不说吗？简直2B到家了。
江湖生，江湖死，江湖恩怨江湖见
韩国电影有时候的通病这就是拖泥带水，剪到一个半小时就好了。男主动不动就红眼圈，是个人演技？还是导演要求呢？整体其实挺好的，就是把人耐心磨没了
牛肉没有吃成，珍珠项链也没送出去，民宿就更不用提了。
完美生活的假象与少女成长的痛苦与好奇，虽然有点不太贴合但还是缝合起来了。只不过孵化这个意向的指代太过明显，简直不能算是隐喻。在这个立意下丧失了恐怖趣味或悬疑元素，观众仿佛也是在配合一场演出。
没能认真看完
3.5分 尔虞我诈 最后只能被迫无奈认清事实 做到最大 好像年纪大了 看不了这种刀子捅来捅去 感觉真的好痛 最后复仇般杀了该杀的人 却没明白怎么又杀了要保护的人……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
