A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
最后的唐顿庄园（就让它停在时代潮流席卷前吧）
22_087。不错，尽管我剧没看完也依然人基本都认得，外加还是那熟悉的音乐。有人死去，有人诞生，生命本就是一轮回，
默片时代结束，有声电影开始。历史总是要往前走的，只有唐顿庄园永远年轻。
为了让它更像一部电影，在情节结构上做了有限的努力：从婚礼开始、以葬礼结束，从默片时代到有声电影时代。我知道它不是一部好电影，但在老太太离世的段落还是哭得泪流满面。从第一部开始就在极力渲染的离别情绪，时至今日，似乎必须正式向那个以优雅高贵的典范与惯例为日常生活方式的时代告别。黄金时代的落幕，像是在唐顿庄园的外墙遍洒余晖，而漏雨的屋顶则要伴随着新生活的改变，被填补，被覆盖。祝福遥远的人和生活，在看不清未来的New Era.
2022年拍1920年的故事，却还是纯粹的1920年的思路和价值观。这就是遗憾之一吧。
太碎了，格调也没延续好，开篇婚礼那幕镜头切得乱七八糟，瞪大眼睛才能找到一两个公爵和Mary 的镜头，更衣室的故事也几乎没有，电影剧组进入、老夫人的秘密这些框架原地保留，执行按剧版拍不会这么糟糕的。最后还是为老夫人的离去感到伤感，但是因为人物都被打散了，这种伤感也没汇集成一股力量。很可惜，看来是最后一部了。
蛮有意思的！但是就是感觉刚刚展开就结束了。感觉鬼灭一直有这个问题吧。
tips这电影对非唐顿迷不友好，会看不懂
婚礼对葬礼，死亡对新生。
3倍速好爽。
这里是主要角色聚集的地方，可以说是重要的一个转折点，所以这次的鬼并没有特别难打，但还是蛮有特色的， 依然好看。
我妻善逸只有一招，但一招能闪杀一切，也能单挑上弦。是否太偏心了T﹏T
没想到是个Bad Ending，猝不及防地和唐家屯灵魂老太太告别了。从默片电影到有声电影，唐顿庄园也迎来了它的新时代，但我真的不想和这个系列说再见...
两星给连贯顺畅衔接自然的打斗动作，不能再多了。讲三小只的相遇，乱嘈嘈、罗里吧嗦的剧情、废话连篇。
可以一看，粉丝向，否则会觉得人物太多关系太乱。引入的戏剧冲突是到法国南部继承庄园，唐顿被租来拍电影，接下来是老太太当年的恋爱史、老爸的出身，电影向有声的转变、收音员编剧、导演跟大姐的情谊。算是大团圆结局吧，好多对儿有情人终成伴侣。大姐的毒舌，跟奶奶很像啊，也只有她有能力管好庄园。几年没看，都变化了好多，连孩子都这么大了。
倪豆子过于可爱了🥺
Granny的离世宣告了一个系列的结束；四角俱全的努力，八方都照顾到也基本上都蜻蜓点水，很多角色都没正经台词和decent银幕时间。大表姐、二表姐都与时俱进，老爷有点儿返老还童（身世疑云弄得人都失态了），大姐夫只存在于台词里，三妹夫等于和唐家屯没啥关系了，最后抱孩子来聚集众人实在有点儿不自然。小火车颜值回升啊！（星星眼）——（6/10演技状态也恢复到剧集时期了，各种微妙精细的小表情小眼神，太舒服了）但是一点儿有意思的情节故事都没有，才认识一个月就要跟人跑？！Poor thing, doomed in this life. 电影院里全是“唐铁粉”，旁边坐着一个特意请假来的（不让买隔座位的票！）结束后，字幕都出完了，后面还有人意犹未尽地巴拉巴拉唐家屯回顾呢（等得清洁小哥无可奈何的）。（5/20）
像老友叙旧，说起来也没什么大事，但聊着聊着还是唏嘘不已，慨叹时光流逝时代变迁，尤其默片到有声电影的转变。加一星给情怀。
是谁想出来的，把剧场版分成TV版，然后再把TV版合成剧场版，玩呢？
😏剧场版加点新东西剪成TV还不够，还要把TV再剪成剧场版。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
