Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
比2顺畅，除了高潮部分有点平，观感还行。
和这部比起来新蝙蝠侠是社会学论文，建制派还能靠意志力暂时战胜无政府主义者。和新蝙蝠侠比起来这部是经文的儿童读本，解决人的问题只能在祭坛乞求神明显灵。
纯路人 不懂你们GGAD 感觉麦子抱着麒麟溢出来的感情都比跟裘花强烈 over
邓布利多的秘密只有光电ZJ知道。拍得很好，下部别拍了。
看电影之前我查了一下给第二部打了两星还觉得自己也太harsh了 可是神奇动物到底在哪里啊 为什么我唯一的神奇是要为了你们蠢笨人类的登基啊 几几年了啊
四星半，不是原著粉，不是哈利波特迷，更不是演员的粉丝，观影感受很不错。看过哈利波特系列，所以看到一些场景再现，让人感觉“回归”。
在大屏幕上看魔法世界是最爽的！这个世界还是需要相信魔法的，不然太无聊了！第三部感觉拍得很圆满，过瘾
格林德沃没什么罪，甚至没看出有什么野心，哪怕纯装逼也要装一下吧。邓布利多也没什么谜，结了个血盟还藏着掖着半晌才给抖出来。埃尔扎·米勒更是几乎没有戏份，这条线几乎作废白铺垫那么久，都第三部了我不明白编剧到底对故事有什么想法？对剧情走向有什么前瞻布局？明明是梦幻开局，华纳你有事吗？怎么可以允许如此混乱的剧本得到批准？
Cinity 非粉丝看个热闹，邓布利多去哪里？
情怀给四星。话说，邓布利多的秘密就是和格林德沃的血誓吗。各种质疑就不说了，印象最深的是各种特效，还有嗅嗅……魔法的世界永远是心中所向。看麦斯，脑补的却是德普，还是他的眼神够劲儿。
故事相比该系列第二部更加明朗，简单粗暴，人物脸谱化。但换句话说就是废角很多，为了剧情的时长和转折而写。美-英-法-德的三部漫游并没有带来更为波澜壮阔的魔法世界，反而暴露出作者被困一隅的江郎才尽，魔法大战不及冒牌神秘客的万分之一，也就只能靠卖腐和政治讽刺强撑趣味。
也太烂了吧，简直像个突兀的半成品。看出来剧组没钱整特效了，两拨人仿佛在站着面对面用嘴炮魔法…
气球大飞飞！小龙虾扭臀舞，神奇效果挺多的，书本，面包，动物少了点
这到底是在干嘛，满头问号。GGAD也嗑不起来，但光明顶对战老麦的一眼深情有被打动到，我勉强可以当拔杯代餐。
哎，这是啥电影，这特么就是大型离婚现场。吃瓜吃得我口水从眼睛里流出来。
工作太忙了，没去电影院看。没去也罢，反正评分和口碑也不咋好。3星给视觉效果。
CG牛逼，特效不错，武戏最好看竟然是在开场的桂林山水!但是故弄玄虚且拖泥带水的文戏太多，感觉好像憋了很久就只放了一个屁。六大门派围攻不丹，格林德沃向麻瓜宣战，莫不是影射希特勒屠杀犹太人的滔天大罪?
大卫椰子请滚出魔法世界，不要再用你贫瘠的想象力和粗糙的视听语言毁梦了！华纳已死！逻辑稀烂，主客颠倒，情节拼凑，人设崩塌，重点不清…几乎挑不出个优点，感谢老汉替演（不过老汉上一次来魔法世界也是个工具人，就这么烂的剧情感情线全靠演技托着）。总结为四个字——什么玩意！五年前前传出来的时候，绝对想不到会是这么个走势😭
4.8 多花500坐了vip看，心疼死。屎裡找糖，麥花好嗑，但GG這個角色寫得好沒意思
我很肤浅，这服化造，这布景，这场面，请给我再拍十集！两中年人打架时候我想的就是，别打辣，去床上打！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
