Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
Not my type,maybe rainy like it.
属于那种其实没啥大意思，但观感极佳的电影。清新自己的剧情和温柔可爱的男主如沐春风，本身就是一种美好。
3.5，最近喜欢看一些爹味不那么重的电影❤️很有意思的新人导演/演员，应该是不少千禧一代/z世代能共鸣的作品。故事有些cliche，配角的塑造也有些欠缺，但其中很多对话都写的十分有趣。雨中戏远景里的车竟然是三维渲出来的真的很好笑🤓
哪有那么多绝对呢 就这么时常回头看一眼地走下去吧
郊区中产年轻白男的自得自满，好在拍得确实丝滑。
7/10 其实很多细节还不错啦，domino母女关于solitude和empty room的台词还是很有echo的，plus 霓虹灯下的Mrs grey 谁看了不迷糊
3-，算是典型的插曲介入型成长故事，人物关系、发展都很老套。
于是，故事的全部内容，就是“帮他实现，然后你自己也实现”（给弟弟出谋划策追女友）、“帮她强大，然后你自己也强大”（走入自闭症女孩的内心）、“帮他们和解，然后你自己也和解”（抑郁过的母亲和古板的难于亲近的继父）、“帮她放下，然后你自己也放下”（在爱情里已经伤痕累累、却还能与你来上一段情感纠葛的单亲妈妈）。
所有人，尤其是两个女主的演技简直棒呆，太有质感了！
7.5/10分
男主又温柔又善良然后用一片真心换来thanku for looking after my family。这段故事就结束了。达妹竟然到演妈妈的年纪了。🥲
爱真的很简单，但生活太难。
太太太扎实的剧本，舒服，好看。我爱你，可是我还在做一只飞鸟的年纪，你也明白我的翅膀挂不住另一份重量，我们是若即若离的soulmate 。im just a dumb kid
一位年轻男孩自导自演的第二部作品。
…are they a moment？maybe a life time。
本来抱着随便追追电影手册的心态去看（因为之前不喜欢《湮灭》），看完之后喜提2022观影最佳～
Cooper长的好像PTA，也和PTA一样喜欢在片子里塞配乐，一个更小成本更青春更简单更没有技巧更朴素的PTA；融化在喝了一杯的不羁夜里，消失在二十多岁的迷茫梦里
其实挺讨厌安德鲁这种满嘴跑鸡汤的年轻人，暖男又谈不上，有脾气有毛病的暖男不讨喜，但故事还不错。
男主自导自演的小成本治愈系小品电影 免不了平淡 免不了话痨 免不了无趣 在此时此刻抱着猎奇心理看这样一部新电影 收获和期待不成正比 但拍得再廉价 剧作也在克制之下显出了一些心思
年轻导演的第二部自编自导自演的长篇 不得不说感情敏感细腻的不像一部美国电影倒是像日式治愈篇的感觉 在踏入社会前的迷茫与彷徨 但积极乐观又善良可爱 不知是自己的心态还是什么成年后很少遇到这样单纯善良的人 但这个剧本还有许多可以雕琢的地方
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
