The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
剧情转折和事件都比较生硬刻意，还有偷猎者那里的特效也太拉胯了吧
很温暖，很治愈的一部片子。西藏的美景、藏族人民的条件艰苦、淳朴与善良都可以很好的体现。能感受到新人演员和小孩子的特别自然，导演也是尽力还原三十年前真实的生活，对于支教真是异于常人所做出的选择，真的很伟大。
藏区恶劣的环境和艰苦的生活条件，让支教老师不知所措，但孩子们的善良纯朴，让老师心坚定不移地做出奉献。
曾经支教过，看到这部电影在爱奇艺播出，冲了个会员，做过的事情，看相同的人再做一次有共同的感触，只是当时支教条件没这么差，希望国家越来越好，扶持贫困山区
近期观看体验比较好的电影之一，没有那么多浮夸的特效和跌宕的情节，但就是看的让人流眼泪
真心佩服支教老师啊，不过孩子们也都是天使，非常能理解老师的心情
电影比较正，套路比较经典，没什么惊喜，不过演员演的不错，起码能让我相信他们是那个角色。
电影中的男主处理起任何事情来都得心应手，就很优秀
感觉可以多拍一些这样的电影，很有教育意义，也让我们看到了藏区的真实生活
男主的母亲也很开明，他没有将男主局限在自认为很好的条件下，而是放任他去追寻自己想要生活的地方，只可惜最后都没能看到自己儿子成家
环境的艰苦表现出来了，但是其中也是有开心和感动的，藏区支教之旅从根本上改变了男主的人生。
没有烂俗的剧情，很多事情可以说是特别真实，美中不足是特效问题，不过这是文艺片，也可以理解
那么，我们终其一生，是为了什么呢？
孩子们长大后都很有出息啊，作为老师韩松能对他们一视同仁当成自己的孩子爱护教育，很尊敬
这样的好电影不多了，给了教育工作者很大的鼓励，就算工作很累很辛苦，也一定要坚持下去。
这里的人格局都拉开了啊，没有勾心斗角狗血情节，有的都是为了孩子为了藏区努力贡献的一群人
但他为了藏区的孩子们，依旧留了下来。
之前看过纪录片，说贫困人口大多数居住分散、偏僻，办学条件差，教育设施落后，贫困户生活困难，无力支持子女上学，适龄儿童失、辍学率较高，导致有很多人没接受过教育，所以支教真的很重要
正沉浸在支教的感动和对草原美景的震撼中，看到一条弹幕“这里的人这么单纯只是因为没有接触到外面复杂的世界”。突然就感动不起来了，单纯的人性和复杂的世界在一起，好像才更令人动容。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
