Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
一个大部分时候都不开心的戴妃 但是有谁在在乎这点故事 除了克里斯汀斯图尔特的粉丝……
恪守成规的宅邸，不成体统的晚宴，珍珠项链。破碎的婚姻，微弱的违抗，珍珠项链。安妮博林，伊丽莎白，珍珠项链。漂亮的脖子上丑陋的枷锁，魂归故里，一路向前。心理惊悚片的质感，让人难以喘息，KS的表演是有瑕疵的，但隐隐的戾气和挤出的笑容和影片很搭
中规中矩的喜剧片儿 贵在细节处理 手机扫充电宝啊 维修车啊 带小兄弟看病啊等等都很真实
威尼斯主竞赛第五场，欲戴王冠必承其重👑。她只想做回斯宾塞小姐，而不是当威尔士王妃。斯图尔特演的很棒远超我的预期。我最想知道的是那件高定Chanel礼服的花费👗。
斯图尔特终于又拿出了久违的“暮光之城”里的表演，令人怀念。
皇家《闪灵》！从另一边开门的冷藏库，到斯坦尼康的走廊，到孔雀绿的卫生间、四处逡巡的幽魂，当然还有精神分裂边缘的戴妃，她窗边惨败的面庞，以及充满噪声的无调性的音乐、高饱低差的色调、空旷压抑的超广角，帕布罗·拉雷恩对库布里克进行一种讽刺性的模仿，给出一组全然情绪性的影像。但问题也在于，这并非原创。
皇家芭比。国民玩偶。连服装师都无权选自己称心的。其实老公出轨什么的，真的还在其次，那种“我”的无处安置和完全消失，才是痛苦的根源，整个系统没有谁在乎你的感受，只拿你当妥妥的工具，把你展示在风光的橱柜里。贵为王妃，内里也不过是个缺爱的小女孩而已。看到她寝宫的窗帘被缝上的一刻，我在画外也感到了等量的窒息。而带着两个儿子飞奔出宫的一刻，忍不住替她飙泪。暮光女的戴妃只能停留于静态欣赏，一旦动起来，肢体和仪态太尴尬了，驼背耸肩缩脖子，啊……这是香奈儿也修正不了的灾难。
轻喜剧，虽然就认识一个刑冬冬，但其他演员也都不赖
“笼中鸟”的概念执行得不错。从某种程度上来说，戴安娜也是王室养的“野鸡”，为了给民众编织谎言，打造童话。王妃必须要有，但并非不可替代。
3. 后来则是神经衰弱。她演得很好，让我看着也快发神经了；
典中典的戏路，被迫组队-制造矛盾离队-再营救。上百辆出租车追逐拦截属实大场面了。
看多了各式各样情绪糟糕或失控的Diana，我反而觉得更喜欢她，美丽优雅或丑小鸭变天鹅这样的形容其实真的很无趣，她身上的那种鲜活感和存在感比装模作样的皇室好多了
很漂亮但不聪明的DIANA the shocked
还行吧 虽然有主角滤镜但是挺逗的 当个无脑片看看没啥问题
剧本稀烂，矫情死我算了
戴安娜大概是一个选择错了道路的孩子，她年纪轻轻就将自己置身于这个精致且条框分明的陷阱之中，结尾瞬间的释放与欢愉，反倒有着无限怆然的意味。
这个大概就是典型的，表演情绪然后完全陷入情绪的那种电影，所有演员都没有什么特别亮眼的地方。
这电影真的不错。很多细节很严谨。故事情节也非常好。很欢乐、很燃。看过非常保镖后对这个电影没啥太大期待。但没想到很出彩。缺点在于缺少一些电影的质感。
吃了虚假安利去看的，看完只感觉浪费了两个小时，单单就整个故事来说，他是合格的，逻辑圆的上，该有的伏笔包袱也都有，但也就仅此而已了。因为没有看过毛骗，所以很多梗和笑点完全get不到，整个过程仿佛在看一篇平白直叙的流水账作文，太过寡淡了。
这电影好看得一阵儿一阵儿的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
