Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
艾玛汤普森大胆的表演，值得她在今年的颁奖季拿下奖杯，影片全靠对话来推进精致的剧情，又不让觉得老套，勇敢的探寻了少有前人探索的题材，不必为衰老的肉体和容颜的伤身，也别羞于谈性，性能带来的快乐，overrated but necessary。如果说有什么流俗的地方，其实还是，如果不加那一点点的感情，编剧也怕观众接受不了纯粹的性。
很有伯格曼的感觉，空间局限在小房间里，看点在两人间的互动张力变化。Nancy太有趣了，前半段我一直在笑，以及没想到第一次居然是个从白天开始的case！看了大家的负面评价，看时完全没有想到那部分。我觉得影片的重点在“年老后渐成的女性主义新成员”，以及片子写男人的心理也写得挺好的。男主的劲儿有点儿陈伟霆。
另，现在好大的雨
很喜欢对性的探讨，是Fleabag以后最喜欢的了！第三次会面谈到妈妈稍微有点过，第四次真好。
最松弛的一刻，才能抵达高潮。于是对老年生活充满了信心
从头到尾只让人看到一件事，女性的性压抑。别的东西都是泛泛而谈，像男主的肌肉一样空有其型，一个训练有素的ai完成女主设定的程序。但是性压抑性羞耻这件事太值得说了所以多加一星，我现在都不知道怎么合理看待。性是不好的这件事，如果是父权制带来的，为什么没有任何男性受到过这种洗脑影响?又为什么是女性更容易emotionally attached to the sex partener?有待探索。
一名传统保守的女性通过被一名sex saint生理心理双重治愈之后所完成的人格转变，单一空间变成了香艳浪漫的诊疗室，通过对话延伸出女性对于性、身份、教育、人生等等困扰与压抑——这戏能这么红完全展现出一种困境，不是单纯的性压抑，而是女性太希望将性与亲密关系连在一起，而男主完美到大部分女性都不敢相信这是真的。买卖关系似乎更保证了一种安全和尊重，这是现实的悲剧。3.5.
And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson
简单说三点感想：
本人最爱的是那支舞和结尾——第一次接受，当fantasy来到现实，也许并不会那么糟糕。
leo的眼睛真的太好看了！那些对话慢慢抽丝剥茧出面具下的两个人。Emma这个真的是登峰造极的表演...啊~pleasure~
各自治愈了自己，所以亲密关系其实是来自匆匆过客，最后还是要自力更生吗？（手动狗头）
虽然只有两个人的戏，但是人物关系的渐近，和慢慢剖析出的人的性格和背景都非常有戏。感觉是很好的戏。
剧本的任何一个铺陈都在为了让这个故事变得合理化，女主的职业和面对性的不自信，胆怯，都很真实，男主的颜值，身材，让两人的互动变得那么有化学反应。从不敢到彻底解放，性的解放，也是女性对束缚的解放。评分：7.5/10。
选角也太成功了系列。矛盾是有趣的，“你一定会是只好猫。”
饮性欲之鸩，解孤独之渴。剧本写的有波兰斯基电影那调调，女主角色设计上无懈可击，对比之下其实男主角色的背景设计的略显符号化，正如片中所说像个性圣人。一个有意思的点：性满足是会让人觉得可以所向披靡。享受愉悦是很美妙的事情，性愉悦是上帝赐予每个普通人珍贵的礼物。但既然是欲望，私以为就和其他欲望没有太大区别，欲望是个深渊啊……
剧本写得挺好，大致循着“坦诚相见”的路数，从非常资本主义的购买fancy幻想，到撕破脸后更authentic的亲密关系，最后的reward就是“真”的orgasm（也是独立的）。细节扎实，跳舞时男主手搭在艾玛脖子上，艾玛的反应和后来的台词是呼应的，这种潜在的连接体现了关系中意识的流动性，然后是创造性，结尾扣回目标颇得曲径通幽之妙，适度的爱让人在亲密中展现尊严，在当下看，会数次分心想怎么不洗手，但或许我们正需要从界限处重新找回亲密感，那种梳毛对梳毛、耳语对耳语的亲密感。
60年代新左派运动的回响，去探索身体和性爱，这意味着愿意接受自己的欲望和种种缺点，以更包容的眼光去看待自己的身体和其他人的选择。
慢火煮酒，余韵悠长。
太好看了！讲欲望但毫不低俗 确实没什么好羞愧的，从肉体满足甚至能上升到人生哲学讨论 人人都应得到愉悦
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
