The subject of Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub’s Der Tod des Empedokles (The Death of Empedocles, 1987) is the Greek pre-Socratic philosopher Empedocles (c. 490 BC – 430 BC), who lived in the Greek colony of Agrigentum in Sicily. His theories are mentioned in several of Plato’s dialogues. He maintained that all matter is made up of four irreducible elements: water, earth, air and fire. A mystic and a poet, he is considered to be the founder of classical rhetoric. He is also thought to be the last Greek philosopher to write in verse; two fragments of his works survive: Katharmoi (Purifications) and Peri Phuseôs (On Nature). An advocate of democracy, he came into conflict with his fellow citizens of Agrigentum and, as result, was banished with his young disciple, Pausanius. When he was asked to return, he preferred to commit suicide by throwing himself into the active volcano at Mount Aetna.
The German writer Friedrich Hölderlin wrote two versions of Der Tod des Empedokles in 1798 and 1800, and a final third version in 1820, all three ultimately unfinished. They were conceived as five-act tragedies and all three differ in plot. According to Michael Hamburger, Hölderlin’s English-language translator,
the main reason why Hölderlin finished no version of the play must be that he remained too closely identified with Empedocles, at the very period in his life when his own view of the poet as philosopher, prophet and priest – and as tragic hero – was subject to perpetual crisis and re-examination.
Huillet-Straub’s The Death of Empedocles is based on Hölderlin’s first version (the longest of the three), whereas Black Sin is based on the third version.
很惊喜，印度电影也有女性议题了。总理是女性这个设定很妙，如果总理是男性，难以想象这个故事会如何进展。结局大快人心。片末字幕令人痛心，在印度，两小时就有8位女性受害者。
整个电影的压迫感不及孟买酒店，最大的意外应该就是那个被绑的司机原来就是当年qj女主的罪犯
可怕的現實…但實際上不以暴制暴根本無人在意…
看完心情有些沉重，社会对女性的关爱确实少了些，女主即使身患抑郁症还是带给小孩子开心，不忍伤害他们。
电影里的主角走正规法律途径被忽视被辜负 不得不用极端做法才得到社会关注 而现实中为人间惨剧而呐喊的声音也得被包裹在跌宕起伏反转不断的快节奏复仇爽片糖衣里方能顺利喂给主流大众
70/100 放在印度的语境下，社会意义远远超过了影片本身，她是中国的药神，是韩国的熔炉，是社会阴暗面一个呐喊的突破口；她也更是理想主义的——所有进展都在计划之内，所有要求都能被满足，更是撼动了法律，反观现实世界，又是多么的无助。
印度电影的bgm有点魔性了，剧情一开始抛出了太多悬念，以至于后面就是人物悉数登场，简单的答疑，没有了叙事。没有不好看，也没有特别难看。生肉版增加了太多笑点😂
胜在立意和前后呼应，技法太差，大量无用的镜头和强作惊悚感的配乐，表演痕迹也很重。补充一点，印度英语让我全程如坐针毡，还不如用本土语。
用犯罪的方式惩治犯罪，用违法的行为呼唤守法。弱者的以暴制暴充满悲伤与无奈，但却鞭挞了印度的体制，雪崩之时没有一片雪花无辜，体制溃烂之后任何一个官僚都难辞其咎。走严肃路线批判现实，阿三尽力了。
No country for women！别再踩印度了，谁比谁烂还不一定呢
黨呐喊都聽不到，無動於衷的時候，只能采取極端行動了。之所以極端是因爲是唯一的出路。
以为是悬疑剧 两小时啊 2022年了想看些新的剧情
又向女性被强奸案进一步的痛诉，希望社会能向前迈进一步
故弄玄虚的推镜和配乐有些神烦，好在瑕不掩瑜，象征意义大于剧作本身。“拍出来又改变不了现实有什么用呢？”能拍敢拍，就比没法拍有意义。不积跬步，无以至千里。
片子整体质量三星，但4星推荐一看，前半段拖沓，也有蛮多不合理的细节，但片子本身的意义跟最后的反转还是有看点的，如果一部影片让你对所处的环境，体制，身份，角色，还有这个世界的运行规则有一定的思考，就还是值得一看~~~~PS:印度片拖沓是常态，要习惯，，，再曝个粗口，TTMMQJF是没有手的吗。。。
“官方统计，在印度每16分钟，就有一名女性被强奸”，立意🐮，尤其对于魔幻现实主义的阿三来说，但这个套子实在是太老了，谁是弱势群体，谁有诉求就把谁套进去，长此以往，大众会永远吃这一套？，还是说如此公式化的偷懒最终会导致“电影中提出的问题只能在电影里得到解决”，在现实中再激不起一丝回响?🤔
1.错过了两周，总算是在这个星期四看了这部《星期四》了。不过原名《A Thursday》还是翻译成《一个星期四》更为恰当。2.影片于我有些印度版《恐怖直播》之感，看到后面又联想起《开端》和好些新闻事件；3.渺小个体的声音不被听见或重视，当事人只好另辟蹊径、选择非常手段来引人注目，增加问题被关注并解决的可能性；4.片尾字幕：Since you’ve started watching this film, as per statistics, 8 women have been raped in our country. 自你开始观看这部电影，据统计，在我国已有8名妇女被强奸。
其实电影还有不少刻意的地方，甚至刻意的翻转，但是节奏把握尚可，而且叙事也能由浅入深。所以给个意义分也不错。
论如何揭开一个犯罪，那就用另一个更大的犯罪！有点类似“长夜难明“讲故事的方法，紧凑感不足，力度不足，结果也过于美化
可以看 就是切换情绪和l拉近镜头制造紧张氛围有点突兀 还有一些不必要的镜头
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
