Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
乌克兰对乌东地区的暴行!快进看完。
好看诶，每个时代的童年都有他们有意思的地方。以及这个画风我可
“人的记忆就是这么奇妙 就算他睡着了 以后也会觉得亲眼见证了人类登陆月球” 小男孩因睡觉错过了登月直播 只好在脑中杜撰了一个自己登月的版本 后半段小男孩的登月狂想与真实登月录像的平行蒙太奇非常抓人 前半段是导演私心放入的美国60年代的日常生活图景 从生活百态到流行文化不一而足 动画的形式让整个观感非常舒服
没想到是根据爱在三部曲导演的经历创作的！后悔晚知道了！
蛮可爱的片子，能感受到六十年代美国家庭的氛围和人类登月的激动。开始认为林克莱特又一次用真人转描动画可能仅仅是为了省钱，事半功倍，后来转头一想这毕竟是Netflix的片子。转描可以让如今人们已经见怪不怪的景象变得焕然一新，这是小男孩在沙发上看着电视睡着时做的梦，也是他长大后诉说的回忆。那个年代要是没有电视没有电影真就像是挖去了生活中的一大块乐趣，即使是在太空竞赛，电影院在放《2001太空漫游》电视上在播《太空登月记》，依然能让人对未来产生美好的向往
过度煽情（油漆看上去都是假的），看到一半基本看不下去了。“所有人都想去莫斯科，而你却相反。……（因此）你是个渣男。”
太好看了吧不管是剧情还是人物我都好喜欢救命值得推荐一下
………………
用Essay形式来讲故事。美国的六十年代和我们的九十年代差不多，所以看得我这个八零后觉得好亲切。
很喜欢这种在真实历史事件中插入一些亦真亦幻的故事元素；如果可以，真的很想体验一把太空时代的生活，感觉全人类拥有同一个理想的感觉一定很棒！
这是一个拥有情怀的，五彩斑斓的，写给自己童年的情书。他表达了对那个年代生活的休斯敦孩子内心的渴望，一个个有趣的小细节小故事都展现出了爱。但是绚烂的糖果们依旧构不成一道正餐。开局很吸引人，但整个电影的前一个小时，这些细碎的回忆。实在是不值得这些篇幅，这表达方式格局太小了。小到好像两个中年人喝多了在聊自己的儿童时代一样，在这样的时代大背景下，一个少年怀着对航天伟大的幻象，度过了这个不寻常的夏天，这确实很美好，但整部电影的表达与诉说。仿佛在告诉我，这一切都与你们观众无关。
他们那个年代的童年，丰富多彩，
浓浓怀旧风，过去许多单纯的美好再也回不去了。
人到中年（老年）总要拍一部来追忆童年系列，旧时生活的细节是最有趣的。
看到奶奶带孙子孙女去看音乐之声竟然泪目，有点奇怪
基本上和国产电影是一个水准，中俄的相似性令人汗颜
虽然情节上没有什么波澜起伏，但片子将那时候的年代感表现得很好。3.5分吧
干吧！达瓦西里！为了顿巴斯的解放！为了清除所有的乌纳！乌拉！8分
反观我们，还为生存，
从电影的角度来看，这片片拍的很烂。严格的说，这片片是俄罗斯🇷🇺的宣传片——只反应乌东地区乌克兰政府军的暴行，但是没有给出原因……不管怎样，战争都是残酷的，战争都是对生命的犯罪。人类已经来到了今天，来到了全球化、科技异常发展的时代，除非疯子、稍有理智者，稍有对生命有尊重的人，就不可能首先发动战争。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
