剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 诗祥 4小时前 :

    可能是年纪大了,一部温情小品,又感动到稀里哗啦。但是这个剧本和题材真的太催泪。感谢编导,借着女主角,带我们走入聋哑人的世界,让我们看到太多的不平等和隔阂,也对充满爱、理解和包容的世界心存希冀。

  • 潘寄南 6小时前 :

    拍得太好,全方位的。上一次看到这种扎实的二人对位人物关系的电影还是《杀人回忆》,你成了我我成了你,而且这部更执着更纯粹在描摹这种对位的人物关系,无论是构图和黑白光影处理,切入点细微,导致后半程的以人物关系映衬时代的格局展开得非常宏大,非常好的二人关系以及以小见大的叙事范例。这个电影无时不刻都在展示对位和冲突,但又异常平静。没有比这个文本更适合用黑白来展现了,这个对立的人物关系和人物命运就是黑与白本身。

  • 珊涵 4小时前 :

    当然,困难都是制造出来的,可还是如此打动人心,想把原版的看一遍,又有点不想看了。我要哭瞎了……

  • 月梅 6小时前 :

    离teenage period真太远 远到很难get that point 男女主一起跳下去的湖是我看来最羡慕也最喜欢的场景了。an actor's line blew my mind is "You know why god made farts smell? so deaf people can enjoy them too"

  • 郁运 6小时前 :

    pps.片名CODA是Child Of Deaf Adult的意思。

  • 洁采 4小时前 :

    一种沧凉的安慰感。「所以我不研究善变、难懂的人类,要转去研究通透、明净的事物,用事物来忘却我。」

  • 谭绣梓 4小时前 :

    拍的很有套路的治愈系温馨家庭电影,虽然很有套路,但是贵在拍的很真实贴近生活,很自然。影片对残疾人群体家庭亲情的关注和展现,应该是赢得奥斯卡最佳影片的主要因素,或许学院想让大家更关心关注身边可能遇到的残疾人。

  • 赫念念 4小时前 :

    可能是年纪大了,一部温情小品,又感动到稀里哗啦。但是这个剧本和题材真的太催泪。感谢编导,借着女主角,带我们走入聋哑人的世界,让我们看到太多的不平等和隔阂,也对充满爱、理解和包容的世界心存希冀。

  • 菡彤 9小时前 :

    大道理说多了也累,奥斯卡干脆只说一句,女孩子要有自己人生的梦想,并首先突破家庭的阻挠去实现它

  • 类博实 0小时前 :

    手语课刚被普及CODA的含义,就看到了这部电影。过于规整的故事,女孩上学只是个导火索,最打动人的地方是女孩的妈妈承认自己曾希望女孩也是聋人。涉及到很多面,想宣讲的内容太多,总归还是bright future的故事,想想现实还是很难过的。(有学到美国手语里的一些骂人话)

  • 脱流逸 8小时前 :

    最初的感觉是

  • 由流如 9小时前 :

    拿个最佳改编剧本没问题 拿奥斯卡最佳影片真是不够格。今年太小年了。

  • 柔琳 0小时前 :

    虽然知道刻意的美化,但还是很感人,两难选择中有一方妥协,就会很温馨。

  • 波意蕴 9小时前 :

    整体观影感受舒服,除了有些笑料和表演明显刻意。奥斯卡越来越需要励志了

  • 邵子平 3小时前 :

    原谅我一直代入苏东坡。一个出身名门,见过世面,致力于打破阶层,提倡人人平等的大家。一个出身低微,企图通过读书出人头地,投身仕途改变体制的年轻人。相识于微,却都无法真正的改变现状。

  • 阴暄美 7小时前 :

    好妙好温柔的电影,我喜欢!女孩的三个聋哑家人的表演和转变真的是四两拨千金,当然女孩的表演也很棒,她在面试时,最后一边唱歌一边用手语给家人传达歌词那段太戳人了呜呜。

  • 贤然 6小时前 :

    原版里可爱的妈妈给毁了,原版励志的爸爸变平庸了他身上的好分了一半给哥哥,原版超抢戏的老师这里也一点不出彩,小男友比原版爱她多一些,但就...不咋重要呢,亲情戏基本毁了,爱情戏也莫名其妙,没个铺垫关键时刻小男生忽然就不唱了,妹子内心也毫无波澜~。

  • 裴以松 8小时前 :

    连溪绿暗晚藏乌

  • 桓星 4小时前 :

    抛却官场杂念后,返璞归真。兹山小岛能见天地宇宙,一个人从容坚韧的一生就是史诗。韩国名导能拍出如此纯粹悠远之作,让人羡慕。

  • 类鸿朗 4小时前 :

    音乐和考学的部分就太glee了。听障人士心理活动以及和健全人之间的隔阂部分还可以。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved