Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
可能我心态不对，就是觉得刻意了点，挺好，但没那么好
从芬奇穿上西装那一刻开始直至结束，影片完全走向升华，这不再仅仅是一部简单的灾难片而已了，它在向我们诉说爱的伟大，它在告诉我们一定不能放弃对所有美好事物的期待。ps：那张画有他们仨儿的大桥照片真是直接让我破防。
剧情确实比较简单，放在“爱死机”系列里似乎也不违和。生命进入倒计时的Finch一方面珍视Goodyear的陪伴以至于专门造一个机器人来负责“遛狗”，另一方面却又难以与他人建立信任。在前往旧金山的旅途上，人、动物、机器人三者相互磨合、建立联系。有时不知该说是Jeff的学习曲线过于陡峭还是Finch过于心大，敢于让一个刚刚上手一天的司机开夜路。Jeff在一些技能上的木讷同在另一些情形下的机警也同样形成巨大反差。影片似乎没有解释清楚房车到底是用什么供能，如果是汽油，全程并没看到加油（况且如果已经荒无人烟，管道恐怕也早已荒废），如果是电力，又不能解释为何车顶的太阳能电池板被撞坏后似乎对旅程并没有什么影响。
如果这是一个机器人的口述历史，然后镜头切到未来的当下。会上一个档次吧。
你遇到各种事 你无法控制的事 你会有原始的情绪 在这种时候 如何应对 采取何种行动 将定义你是谁
熟悉的配方，熟悉的味道，熟悉的演技，熟悉的人物关系，熟悉的后启示录景观，熟悉的Don Mclean……虽然视听效果优秀，但有些东西注定不是常看常新。
英国导演英国编剧难怪Jeff会一直说sorry呀
#豆瓣评论不可靠系列#好看，前面情节是推进慢，但是不无聊。从机器人视角出发 介绍世界观，让观众和机器人一起成长。本质上是个父子情的片子。桃子罐头还是小技巧，后面扔球的戏非常好，编剧厉害。情绪很足。汉克斯演的有多好呢 就是也看不出炫技 但是不知不觉已经把你的心俘获了
天，后劲太大了！出不去难道是因为我是养狗人士吗，仅此而已吗
披着科幻外壳，讲的却是一个关于守护的温情故事，末日里的真善美。
这个机器人让我联想起Athlete的Tourist专辑封面的那个机器，再配一曲里面的Street Map，想想都觉得是个perfect match。或许只是我一个人的臆想，又或许，有人同感吗？
imdb 6.8
末世设定却不讲疯狂争抢资源，机器学习也不想未来是否失控，只讲同行三个“人”的故事。
Human experience, is not just imagining, it’s living.
是否再快一点 就能抵达那座桥？maybe not，live a little，human。
不要轻视人的创造力，更不要低估人的破坏力。（人文科幻 大抵如此 ）
鉴于当下好莱坞编剧导演集体大脑崩坏的现状，拍这种剧情简单舒缓温馨的影片是个不错的选择，不会过多暴露复杂剧本压力下编剧导演的无能，也不用顾忌太多电影外的因素，全片基本就一个人类演员，不用担心被指责没有女金刚没有黑人涉嫌骑士，能让人三心二意的把两个小时的电影看下去还有点儿小感动，不反智不喂屎，这已经知足了。
前阿甘教導阿甘機器人哈哈哈哈，stopping，initiative!後面口音倒是越來越自然了。finch是怎麼遭到輻射的？
多年以来汤姆·汉克斯可以说就是高水准电影的保证。在观众们的印象里他几乎很少犯错，保持着出色的选片眼光，并且几乎一部又一部的不断输出着出色的电影作品。
汉克斯终于不再孤独，他有杜威，杰夫，还有一条狗
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
