A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
#补标# 开心麻花失去创作力了吗？这两年马丽遭遇了什么？表演简直灾难…
尬演片，笑点没多好，倒是看了导演不停的致敬，cue其它电影。你这是在秀自己的阅片量吗？
2022春节档最佳！笑点满满！最棒的一点毫无疑问是选中了魏翔当主角，他真正把对电影的热爱，对机会的珍视以及多年表演技法的沉淀全都回馈给了片子，这种感染力和共情毫无疑问是溢出屏幕的。没看过【魔幻时刻】，所以无从比较，单就剧本呈现来说，励志+逆袭+反差+迷影致敬都是很容易出彩的点，邢文雄也做到了克制与平衡，没有滥用。马丽太平淡了，甚至远不及哈维哥的螳螂拳打手。
一锅大乱炖。看到了荒野大镖客，赌神，喜剧之王，教父，闪灵，雨中曲等，场景布置拼凑美国西部，法国街头等风格。设定还蛮有趣，被演了三遍舔刀逗笑，但最后的最后，我知道了魔幻时刻，才知道是翻拍，而电影名字又是这个杀手不太冷（静)。这……好感减少了不止一点点，先不评分，打算看一下魔幻时刻再说_(:зゝ∠)～
【5.5+1】
雨中曲这段迷影还有对剧组里面小龙套角色的刻画都是亮点，只不过影片还是定位成热闹的搞笑片，剧情很有趣，原来是翻拍，戏剧效果不错
春节带爸妈合家欢电影。其他几部对我来说都是雷，就选择了马丽。以为是个比较好笑的喜剧片，结果笑点比想象中的密集多了！不带脑子的笑一笑挺好看！
以及魏翔（卡尔）很像我的班主任
魏翔的自传式电影，虽然更像舞台剧，但演员的努力表演跃然屏幕。许冠杰的歌曲《天才白痴梦》很契合剧情，成功只比未成功多了一点坚持。
马丽魏翔太好笑啦简直就是喜剧的模本，精彩的剧情和演技
大过年我只想不带包袱不被教育不被鼓励的没心没肺的笑一下，ok了，及格鼓掌。
靠改编别人剧本在国内娱乐圈混得风生水起的开心麻花，看来是打算在“零原创”的道路上一路走到黑了，这次能在显著位置标明改编自三谷幸喜的《魔幻时刻》也算业内“良心”。只不过这种越来越架空化、程式化、玩闹化的流水线喜剧，已经离我们的生活越来越远，除了一笑而过（其实也没什么好笑），鲜有能够打动人心的那份“真”（p.s.隔离No.94）
表演，打光，镜头都是明显的舞台剧风格。在春节档上映的喜剧这个定语下，不能不说它是一部改编的很成功的电影。最精彩的是台词的本土化。故事细节上的改编也合理，加上几位老熟人的演绎，的确很好笑。对于商业喜剧电影，这已经够了。魏翔的表演很扎实，没有人永远是配角，生命中总有一些自己的主角时刻。原作更有意义，改编更有意思。好本子真的少哇。
尬演片，笑点没多好，倒是看了导演不停的致敬，cue其它电影。你这是在秀自己的阅片量吗？
以及，魏翔真的值得，也早就值得一个男主了。全片最感动的地方其实在于花絮里哭着说人生第一个男主角那里。
春节带爸妈合家欢电影。其他几部对我来说都是雷，就选择了马丽。以为是个比较好笑的喜剧片，结果笑点比想象中的密集多了！不带脑子的笑一笑挺好看！
一锅大乱炖。看到了荒野大镖客，赌神，喜剧之王，教父，闪灵，雨中曲等，场景布置拼凑美国西部，法国街头等风格。设定还蛮有趣，被演了三遍舔刀逗笑，但最后的最后，我知道了魔幻时刻，才知道是翻拍，而电影名字又是这个杀手不太冷（静)。这……好感减少了不止一点点，先不评分，打算看一下魔幻时刻再说_(:зゝ∠)～
在开心麻花系演员的喜剧日益失望的现在，这部属实挽回了口碑。虽然没有多搞笑，但看得很流畅很舒服。
扯蛋是挺扯蛋😂但是足够搞笑，还有很多迷影梗！看得我哈哈大笑，跟当年《李茶的姑妈》似的。另外，美术也太差劲了点，摄影和灯光还是都很舞台，很不电影，电影语言更是几乎没有。
很好笑，而且有一点点感动，故事也还不错，最近有迷影特征的电影越来越多了。看得出来魏翔的确很珍惜这个演男一号的机会，演的非常认真，加分！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
