Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
多重人格的恶鬼，利用恶魔的低语，杀害一个又一个的人。
剧情拖沓太久了，但是我挺喜欢最后那个串联，结局只属于小说家的happy ending，还挺浪漫的
哈哈 看完这个电影 我被女主的大眼睛给吸引了 我要去追性爱自修室 三部一起应该很爽。
镜头乱，剧情乱，几个年轻的演技实在是差，有点吓人，仅此而已。
云里雾里 看到一半依然懵逼 为了不半途而废搜了简介继续啃完 全程省电不打光 这种单纯黑、血、尖叫、死亡的堆砌，太伪恐怖片了
轮回，时空交叠这些设定并不新鲜，颇有点大杂烩的味道，但让鬼也有了一体两面，人格分裂，这倒有点意思，究竟男主是死在了哪一幕里了呢？~~
首先镜头真的很黑特别黑以至于我很多次都看不到主角的脸只听见咋咋呼呼和铁锹拖动的声音。时间线太多我看的云里雾里的，但是还是有点刺激的
其实并不反对鬼片里面搞什么穿越之类的元素，但是多个时空死了多个人，你得给观众讲清楚吧，全靠观众自行脑补吗，那编剧费用倒是给结算下啊
看起来是双结尾，实际有三个结局，教人想起《妙笔生花》。只是有一点想不明白——大佬有必要为了三张假钞大动干戈挖？
1964年有led灯？！道具师你给我出来 我不打死你！真的！ 其余都很好 就是有点乱 然后就 乱了
这两年少见的拍的不错的恐怖片，最后进入循环。里面小细节还挺多。
想法是挺好的，就是镜头晃的呀！画面还黑漆漆的！
不错，以我的智商能看懂，看到中间就猜到男主死了
建塔和爱情选择之间的两难拉扯没有拍出来，整体中规中矩。开个玩笑：为了抚平爱人的伤痕，将铁塔设计为平顶是不是更合理？
最顶尖的艺术家和艺术品往往都是超前的。无论创意，还是审美，都超越他们所处的时代。这是艺术家们的苦恼，因为明明都是无价作品，却不能即时变现，甚至导致一生穷困潦倒。艾菲尔已经算幸运儿了。他的自由女神像比较接地气，给他积累了一定的名望和财富。而埃菲尔铁塔的设计和建造过程就没那么顺利了。
挺好一个故事，拍的支离破碎，这种知不知道自己死掉了得鬼故事结合错乱时间线，很好很强大
算有几个恐怖镜头吧，但情节有点无语，我以为男主有什么大招呢，就是拿了个小刀到处刺鬼？ 战斗力也不是很行，就发现boss双重人格，就没了
很无聊，整部片子色调太暗了，故事也不好好讲。
整个片子很乱，时间空间错乱的手法，主题表达不明显，恐怖的地方一错乱就失去恐怖感了。主角除了多命体质没啥突出地方。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
