Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
太浪漫了，给我美宕机了，下辈子不长这样我就去把阎王爷给鲨了/ 成为小说家，然后找金敏喜来实现自己的电影梦，我真不知道说什么了，我觉得这拍的是我梦想中的人生
J C在小变态和失控玩家后能够接一部这样的人文关怀电影，不愧是英国女演员。新冠疫情来袭，养老院病房的窘况，所有人都鼻酸
洪导这个把控力 真是一笔多余的地方都没有 小说家的电影中的金敏喜那场戏我死了
起初摄影机连同观众的眼神一起像是茫然的，缓缓拉近，摆出一幅用心地端详的姿态，疑惑并未因此减弱，但过后回望当初，无言的手语已经昭示着这日常的连锁的开端，那些空白也逐渐充盈起来
看的第一部和疫情直接有关的电影，在经历的这一两年难称为顺利的困苦中，听到演员们集体朗诵Sir Edward Dyer my mind to me a kingdom is, 边吃面条边流泪
对于电影来说，不明觉厉是个好习惯，很多电影“玄虚”是真但“故弄”是假。对于一些走的太快的导演，我们好像需要更多工具储备。
Jodie演得颇自然真实。当你又老又病，就是逐渐被社会淘汰的时候，无论你过去有什么丰功伟绩或只是平凡人一个。社会反映的往往就是最现实的，何况大家要面对的是非一般病毒……尽量自救好过等援助。
疫情后看过的第一部所有人都戴口罩的电影。洪尚秀现在每一部的主要用途是用来向大家报告最近的生活动态：我很好很幸福很松弛，我什么都不在乎。
我并非站在洪这种创作模式的反面，但是这点内容老洪翻来覆去的拍大家翻来覆去的看，尤其连结构都几乎放弃了之后，大家真的不累吗……
《引见》的延续，人物关系是几何的变化，最稳定以及最拿手的还是三角形。虽然金敏喜仍是主要角色，但是只是客观的承载容器，“去金敏喜”可能真是一种洪电影的未来趋势。
提供了与主旋律相反的救援视角：非号召的、非规训的；本能的、甚至盲目的。叙事摆烂，转而用状物的方法填充影像。远景的虚焦像眼眶里噙着泪水，在曲折的走廊中来回奔走，如通向地狱之路。急切的结尾可看作莫大的讽刺：左派的愤怒必须由一无所有的人发出，只有这样才显得像在恳求、呼救。
看的第一部和疫情直接有关的电影，在经历的这一两年难称为顺利的困苦中，听到演员们集体朗诵Sir Edward Dyer my mind to me a kingdom is, 边吃面条边流泪
3.5-4。整个观影过程很愉快，可以说是笑声不断了。小说家的设定蛮有意思，一方面像是洪的代言人，一方面又过于执着输出的想法、一味只会强调概念层，加之连个行业从业者都不是，又像是洪对对他作品进行一遍又一遍“点评”的观众的嘲笑。
冲着黑白片，看了半小时，实在看不下去。天热，先洗洗吧。
赤条条的躺在沙滩上，日日
对金敏喜的推崇达到了一个崭新的高度，且没有一丝令人反感。小说家与女演员成为彼此重叠的影像，赞美对方爱上对方的同时也完成了对自我的肯定。金敏喜一人看完电影后的失神表情令人回味，她两的关系再次走向某种不确定。洪常秀总能在看似重复的母题与手法间再次表达出微妙而有趣的差异，的确厉害。
如今我们还在新冠的阴霾下继续摇摆
对于易尴尬体质是一种考验，但不得不说是特别的观影体验。
久久不得挥散而去的轻松小品，关乎情感、关乎日常、关乎个人历史与生命自由。
纯粹的好看，人物状态极其凸显，期待他们性格的展开和碰撞，让人想透过屏幕一探究竟，看过即忘即可
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
