Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很具强烈反差的纪事方式，高饱和度的美景和残酷的战事背景形成强烈冲突。安静祥和的村民生活，孩子们美妙的歌声，白狗软化人心的微笑表情，与下一秒炮弹轰击而至，一切化为灰烬，形成了强烈的冲突。大鹅的电影表现力真有大幅提升了～
拍成剧集应该会很好看 感觉配角有很多故事可以深入讲讲 特别是Esther的家庭背景/期待戳演员未来更多佳作！（片尾旧照大集合完全看不出这么多年的变化 冻龄少年戳老师👌🏻
家人和朋友的支持，能让最困难的危机化险为夷。画面色彩好美，音乐也好听。
就是美国是除了吸烟嗑药就不知道怎么表达人物情感了是吗……
大型mv现场，琉璃质感的眼睛，帅啊，他的演技在这种青春片够用的。片尾还有几张以前我最爱的油管时期的照片。
就是说，夏天、海边、少年很容易肚子里胀气然后放出一个叫爱情的屁。
戳爷真的好看，简单的一个治愈系的故事，重要的是要去拥抱生活
原来这就是戳爷，果然是经得起考验的颜，怼脸拍依然美。那浓浓的艺术少年感有几分甜茶的错觉，突然也发现他和甜茶演GAY时候的差距。清新的小GAY青春片，截取了艾滋是否确诊前的三个月，本就茫然的少年在各种转折前面对生活和爱。
片子就是一整个大无聊
可爱 感性 喜欢音乐和能说出1962年后所有奥斯卡最佳女主的男人 这不就是戳爷本戳 还有你床头那盏lava lamp 我就当你在致敬金刚狼了是不是是不是一定是的
Fuck you for making me like Taylor Swift.
珍惜陪伴你的人，“会有人全心的爱你”!
氛围感绝了，全靠戳爷撑起来，初二就开始爱的男孩啊
喜欢片头，戳的造型带我回blue neighborhood. Actually it had been years that I haven’t followed him and in this movie he just brings me back to 2015 :( fk I just missing the old days…
非常一般，建议戳希文以后不要演戏，已经没有小时候那种灵气
美式小清新青春片，恋爱、绝症、同性、party、sex，没了。适合粉丝食用，我现在已经有点看不下去这种了。
完全出乎意料，没想到竟然不烂。就是青少年在夏天遇到的一些破事，摔倒了然后爬起来了，不及《我世界的中心》有深度但更简单清新一点
等待结果的这三个月一定是非常磨人的过程，男主在这段时间和家人无理由的闹脾气，和女闺蜜和新男友厮混，整部看起来过得还挺欢快充实的，让人有点忘记可能患上艾滋的痛苦噩耗。整部影片感觉没讲什么内容，印度小哥真的是太不靠谱，撩完就跑，很爱这个色调，很暖很小清新，音乐很好听。
然后，配乐都酷酷，大卫鲍伊很少出现在青春电影了。加一星。
就是对这种美式清新百看不厌，夏日，海边，烟火…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
