Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
会被前两个故事感动，但后两个故事虽然有缺点，更有想法有创意。我一直觉得喜剧很难拍，而有些人就是有点喜剧天分在身上的，腾叔快笑死我了，即便他这一部分不太切题，可是真的太好笑了。除了最后为了强行切题来了一段煽情有点尴尬。
我和我的父辈片头：手与手的相连意为感情的连接，不像《辛德勒的名单》那般的救赎，是普通的小爱汇聚大爱，这部集锦片，由吴京、章子怡、徐峥、沈腾现中国“电影人”拍摄并主演完成，从抗战时期到新中国刚成立再到改革开放然后飞跃到当今社会，四个时期都在讲述一个父子的亲情故事。吴京还是无比的老套到油腻、父子之情净是些虚里飘的东西，即使画面做的再精致、马蹄腾空的定格画面再好，也掩盖不住剧本的薄弱；章子怡，一个女性视角充满着温柔，自然要多煽情你就得多煽情，这在主旋律从来都不缺；徐峥还好，我喜欢徐峥这段，除了开头孩子的朗读和结尾的摩天大楼，美术好，故事也巧；沈腾，作为现在中国应该说为数不多还挺受市场欢迎的喜剧演员，开心麻花只能够大家乐一乐就可以了，笑点还是马丽的耿直和沈腾的动不动的口出金句，继续努力吧hh
《乘风》的战马画面很壮阔，致敬革命先驱。。
战狼的《乘风》，一翔。
见你未见的世界
看了一个视频，有人说是这部电影，看完才发现，我踏马被骗了。吴京这个硬煽情，没啥意思。章子怡这个更无聊，直接快进。徐峥这个还行，沈腾这个也只是一般。这电影真的很无聊，太主旋律了。
20211004 就对徐峥这一段有感觉，其他都一般，沈腾那段像红旗广告，电量持久！总体徐峥>其他三位=一样！🇨🇳
宁浩的北京，徐峥的上海，还有最温情的少年行，有点烂尾🥲
这些为了煽情而煽情的故事，已经感动不到我了。
后三个故事里都是小孩儿，所以都需要用他们的同学对他们的霸凌来展现「父辈」的欲扬先抑吗？？？
《少年行》和《乘风》都半斤八两，沈腾第一次导演的短剧水平一般，吴京强行煽情搞抗日片审美疲劳，是减分项了。
天边的月 心中的念
徐峥那趴挺有可看性的 但我严重怀疑偷师韦斯安德森了
“有国才有家，家是最小国，国是最大家”，爱国不一定是宏大叙事，爱家爱人才是爱国的最高诠释。除去开心麻花的part，应该是国庆三部曲里最好的一部了
这部拼盘献礼片，发掘了章子怡的导演潜力，有机会拍长片的话可以期待一下，情感，故事，镜头语音等运用的都比较自如。
#乘风
徐峥＞章子怡＞沈腾＞吴京。这群父辈不是我们普通人的父辈，我们普通人的父辈的工作没有那么崇高，也没有聪明成先知与外星人的大脑，所以看的过程当中毫无代入感，也毫无感动可言。吴京现在拍片感觉已经没有任何新的东西了，无处不在的《战狼》痕迹，用庞大的场面煽最刻意的情。章子怡的大雨里的那段演技太绝，戏剧张力也够，把儿子关在门外的镜头足够戳人心。徐峥特别有智慧，居然想到了用广告作为主题，在每个人成长的过程中，一定会有几个广告是会被刻在DNA里的。沈腾的像是改编自《疯狂的外星人》，笑点最足的一部，确实有几个地方让我笑出了声，辣目洋子也很出彩。
《诗》用浪漫的方式道出了生命的终极意义；《鸭先知》海派幽默风格，都很喜欢。其他两部分就算了吧
《少年行》。致敬里奥。最喜欢这个。
这种拼盘应该坚持不了多久，但又怕这种拼盘真被坚持很久。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
