Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
其实主要冲着金凯瑞去看的，各种致敬，小丑（chaos is power）、超级赛亚人，被最后的we're family感动到了。总体三点五星。
甚至不知道为什么自己要看这部了……3可能还会看吧……
靠着同行衬托，故事讲得完整流畅，编导演都不尬，还算可以
都2022年了，动画片还能这么难看？说教意义好大。
在挺过了第一部的画风争议后，本以为续作就可以随心所欲地进行创作了，毕竟都有塔尔斯和纳克鲁斯两位新角色的加盟了，照理说应该去主要展示这些游戏角色而非无趣的人类角色了，结果本片愣是硬生生加了诸如瑞秋和卧底FBI的婚礼、周末治安官韦德和与西伯利亚人斗舞等不少感觉完全就是用来凑时长且关联性并不大的情节，虽然我也知道本片是一部真人电影，但我相信大家来看也是为了去看由金凯瑞饰演的蛋头博士，而不是这些无聊的桥段，感觉还不如第一部连贯呢。不过毕竟这个系列就属于偏儿童向的爆米花电影，如果不带脑子就去看的话观影体验其实还算不错，有着不少精彩的动作场面，笑点设计也属于合格水准。总体来说，如果你能接受甚至还有点喜欢第一部的话，那把第二部当作休闲娱乐的选择肯定也完全没问题，所以综合后6.3分。
神速拆车
前面金凯瑞带着红色卫士和钢铁侠的无人机群去抢闪电侠的灭霸手套，后面就没逻辑的注水假婚礼，然后一段夺宝奇兵，之后大战是教学蚁人如何打败反浩克装甲，最后索尼克化身惊奇队长...简直超英大杂烩乱炖，比第一部差远了，也就金凯瑞能看
躲避敌人为啥还要开车？？？
2022.5.6 看完啦!熟悉的剧情套路 比第一部好看一点点 就那样吧～顺便说一下 真的好久没看到金凯瑞了5555
这样，也挺好。
紫霞真美，最后被打动了，回忆起了看大话西游时的感动（看了太多遍以至于已经感受不到了）
演员可以，剧本可以，可看之上，好看之下。男主有点像黄轩。
塔尔斯塔尔斯塔尔斯塔尔斯傍地走，安能辨我是雌雄！
达叔那一段哭了（片方有点心机啊）女主角很靓的，中后有点尬，结尾又有点好看
女主角的扮相很适合呢
看了三代鹿人推荐来看的，改编和创作确实很良心了，想念吴孟达老前辈，老演员的演技还是那么的让人动容，主角演技说实话没毛病啊！
How is this a movie for all ages? I think they should stay it's fitting for people under 10.
外星刺猬和他的超能朋友们打败大魔王拯救地球。比第一部剧情更丰富，更有娱乐性一些。
前面就是个烂片，结尾还挺燃的，三星给情怀吧，很多地方都能想起大话西游
感觉是为8至15岁小朋友拍的片子
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
