Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
其实跟第一部比起来很多部分像是快进了一样，但还是听歌就完事了。
这个卡司。剧情没什么特别出彩的地方，倒是演员太牛逼了，把角色演绎得精彩绝伦。
对欧美乐坛越熟悉，对此片的会心一笑会越多。
仍然无限欢乐 剧情再拉垮怎么着不比格莱美好看 蛋蛋依旧最佳🦍
我们还在拍主旋律，小鲜肉，卖肉网红，和相声演员
剧本立意太差了，本来是一个很好的机会讲讲音乐剧制作背后的艰辛，非要立一个脸谱化的反派，把真正的出品人描写成一个狼心（literally）狗肺，没有逻辑的反派，最后把别人资源嫖完了走了，实属无语。音乐好听，但浪费了前传立起来的角色们。
又好笑又温馨，舞台又美又炫技。套路不重要，开开心心热热闹闹就是最好的
没有上一部打动人心的力量，歌声为绚丽的视效服务。
所以其实我是看了部动物太空歌（舞）剧。。。╮(╯▽╰)╭
争权夺利的政治斗争，口口声声为了正义，哪里有什么对错，其实都有自己的目的。当徐昌大说出“让你坐到这个位置上的人是我”的时候，老大就不可能再用他了，因为太傲慢，伤到了老大的自尊，虽然事实可能如此。目的和手段究竟要不要统一，也许不能一概而论，但人终究都要有自己的底线，只要没有违背良心，用点诡计也没什么大不了的，总比处在劣势仍坐以待毙要强
讲述了一个韩国赵又廷在两家顶级经济公司反复横条的故事
金云范=金大中，韩国民主化进程相当的黑暗和艰辛。世界上所有的选举都是最黑暗的，每个地区每个国家最聪明的那群人玩的勾心斗角的游戏。如果一个有抱负有自由民主理想的人，如果只有正直的为人，基本不可能在这些斗争中脱颖而出，成为改变世界的那个人。薛景求和李善均演技都在线，五星好评。
75。政+治真的不是我们这种小民能涉及的。诡计，厚黑，或者说小人使绊，但都是为了结果。大到国家，小到单位，无处不在。我还是老实呆着吧。
最后的show没有顶起来。环球想用动画片与迪士尼抗衡，还要多在icon上加油，迪士尼光卖Anna的玩具就已经赚得盆满钵满了，这个片都拍到第二部了，那只大猩猩的公仔出货没有？
（5.0/10）其实是没有意义的续作，第一部的情感张力完全无法复现。当时Moon为了保住剧院和一众选手各有心事都促成了结尾那场大SHOW的成功，那是一部主线副线目的一致的作品。现在倒变成了一种团队冒险之旅。各种桥段只是为了花哨刺激而设立，偶尔有点感动人的地方，比如小猪仔们、黑帮老爸也是靠第一部的铺陈。波诺作为一个客串大明星工具性太强太单调了。
看到中间pass掉好几个喜欢的节目就很气，明明主角队上来之前那个超好
一段合格的背景音乐,听着一帮好莱坞明星给动物们配音,我终于可以听出个别人了. 剧情就是合家欢,没啥突破,然后串烧一波年度热歌,没听过的话可以补一下billboard歌单.
还是那一套，不给机会，硬上，这已经成了这类题材的固定模式了。没什么特别出彩的地方，普普通通。歌曲也就那么回事儿吧。角色动机啊，转变啊，都体现不出来。
所以被资本裹挟的创作是完犊子的，搞亲属特殊化也是不可行的，学院派的还不如街头野路子的。
老套的剧情，却依旧能带着你的情绪走，这足以说明它的成功，当狮子弹起歌，他的勇气令我泪目。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
