Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
三星半。一入宫门深似海，放诸四海皆准，没有例外。导演也是敢，全片质量好坏完全就是压在主演的一个人身上，演的好就是好，演不好就是大烂片，好在小k完成的不错，那种精神处在崩溃的边沿上的反复与紧绷，加上全片各种弦乐的拉拉扯扯，看得有点头疼。对于这种近代著名人物的传记片，大家都知道人物走向，要拍得不落俗套，隔壁的角度也真的不易，本片用圣诞节前后三天的时间来聚焦在黛安娜内心的一个角度上，另一天暗线是波琳家的安妮，戏中很多手持移动镜头跟着主角走动，让观众置身现场角力场的感觉，她是叛逆者，但她叛逆的对象是冷漠与背叛与虚假，从始至终她都只是想要爱与真心而已，只有做回Spencer，才能真正的感受生活的乐趣吧，跟自己的小孩在伦敦大桥下吃着KFC那种简单的快乐。当然，我们最后都知道，她不是另外一个安妮。
这并不是一部传记片，而是戴安娜崩溃极值的三日一瞥。周遭人眼中的戴安娜，夹杂着残存的高不可攀、发自心底的怜悯、冰冷卑微的善意、恫吓伪装下的援手。而惊慌失措的戴安娜，灵魂早已被掏空。可从另一个视角，极端的压抑，却给了戴安娜真正的选择机会。她饿疯了一般啃着鸡腿，却也从心底怜悯着雉鸡。她知道雉鸡终究会死于非命，却依旧冲出躺着雉鸡尸体的小路，义无反顾地开车离去，带着儿子们，吃着鸡腿，做回斯宾塞。可能从外貌相似度上，会有更贴近戴安娜的女演员，但发生在克里斯汀·斯图尔特身上，那些耀眼又残忍的镁光灯痕迹，是太多人无法触达的，这是专属于她们的精神领域。尤其是在优秀的莎莉·霍金斯、蒂莫西·斯波面前，小K完全接的住情绪，极大的进步。导演帕布罗·拉雷恩与作曲强尼·格林伍德、摄影克莱尔·马松的携手，视听效果无懈可击。
用工整对称的画面构图来碰撞内心的杂乱 将充满浓烈迷雾的阴冷作为找回自己和下定决心的挑战
比较好的展现了戴安娜彼时濒临崩溃的心态，无助孤独和无处可逃的窒息感用很惊悚片的方式传递出来。但我不太能get到KS的演技，她的台词太劲劲儿的，静态特写镜头下都非常美，但仿佛一个美丽人偶缺乏生命力，或许这某种程度上就是被皇室压得喘不过气的戴安娜王妃的真实状态？
但是你K的演技十年如一日得令人尴尬🍃
不似传记片，神似恐怖片，摄影和美指旨在服务于心理剖析式的哥特童话，庄园就像个阴寒的邪魅之地。很有库布里克式的美学风格：《巴里林登》式布光、《闪灵》式室内构图&运动轨迹、《光荣之路》式庄园外景、《大开眼戒》式静帧，配乐随黛安娜的噩梦起伏，是一幅心理肖像画。
看完The Crown、再看这一部，会有些反差💆🏻 关于黛安娜王妃的影视剧和表演也很多了，想不到KS这部能成为上乘之作。
2.5 手持加爵士配乐把得女主衬得像纽约精神病
最后带着两儿子在奔跑，在泰晤士河边吃炸鸡，真的松了一口气，好好奇英国皇室为啥没有被历史所淘汰？（真的有好大段没听懂讲什么）
Kristen Stewart 太美了。也正是这种极致的美才能传达出这种极致的悲伤。可能是Timothy Spall 的面相吧，总觉得他就像《爱丽丝梦游仙境》里的拿着怀表担心迟到的兔子，那些身穿黑白的女仆就像接受红心王后指令追逐爱丽丝的纸牌。
神神化化一惊一乍，这不是黛安娜，像是某个俗套香奈鹅香水广告：女主惊慌，女主狂奔，女主找到香水喷上就悠然自得。
拍戴安娜最后的落脚点就是她想当个跟儿子吃炸鸡听流行歌曲的中产阶级之女吗？也太矮化这个非凡又独特的女性了...我觉得小K跟戴妃唯一像的地方只有腿。
草地上的稻草人是过去，曾经的我在阳光下放飞自由；
重复渲染的部分剪掉一点，没有展开的地方再展开一点，就好了。很多地方情感已经到位了，有的地方不够。但总体还是很牛逼
28/12/2021 @ 高先電影院。她需要的只是愛。Kristen Stewart其實有點用力過猛
靠着老公送小三同款珍珠项链和仆人到处传话这两点，就想要观众对帝国的王妃共情？对不起，我不行，我只想穿那件抹胸鱼尾裙。
好看！我愿称之为中国版"两杆大烟枪"，编剧下功夫了，环环相扣，三波人在故事线中来回交叉，最后也是结尾在桥上。邢东东演技8错。反转，烂梗，好笑，共同交织成一部优秀作品。当然，中间的感情戏略显突兀，但我也想不到什么办法能让两个冤家分开。总体很推荐！看到我熟悉的石家庄也很温馨。
很漂亮但不聪明的DIANA the shocked
斯宾塞之外，感受理解到更多的反倒是KS自己从内而发的情绪。
3. 后来则是神经衰弱。她演得很好，让我看着也快发神经了；
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
