A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
舒适圈挺好的，能一辈子待着也是一种幸福。我们不能选择自己的出生，却能为他人的出生变成更好的自己。
看完这部电影我难受了许久，不是因为宋康昊竟然凭这样的表演拿下了影帝，也不是因为用韩语来呈现是枝母题所扑面而来的尴尬，而是因为我发现我再也欣赏不了它了，那种纯粹且一厢情愿追求美的善。
Full of narcissistic cliché shit. But Paddington 2 is really good though.
可是通片看完后，我在想，凯奇算不算被消费了呢？或者自己消费自己？
太不容易了 时隔这么久 凯奇终于出现一部好作品 希望凯奇能够重新回归 毕竟电影里这个状态来看 再战十年也不是问题 期待凯奇重新拍出经典电影 能够与大导演合作 重新王者归来
一开场就是瓢泼大雨中的上坡路，差点以为走错寄生虫的片场。而前半段紧凑的节奏和多重悬疑的铺排，也让人联想到奉俊昊式的犯罪片，怀疑是枝导演是不是受到寄生虫的刺激太大了…只有回到最后的那些空镜和抒情段落，才是其得以辩识的作者性手法。可全片看下来，依然是个水土不服之作，甚至比真相还要更割裂的观感。
中途（短暂）看出小偷家族内味了。韩系自我灭绝+日系温情救赎多少有些不搭嘎。忍不住怒喷结尾，不知道还以为误入国产为拿龙标积极向上欢天喜地的和谐vibe，听我说谢谢您！
是枝裕和的这一套还是回到东亚语境下最合适。好的是真相里面的那种别扭和不自然，在这部都看不到了。然而本片更像是是枝裕和对自己的小偷家族的一次无聊重复。与此同时，还不太委婉的掺杂进了一些不太现代的价值观。无所谓对错，但是会有些不适 @SFF2022
如果说水土不服，那就是这个故事放在韩国真的太不自然了，而且姜东元和IU一个也没法给康昊子送戏，唯一能打的裴斗娜和康昊子几乎没有对手戏，饶是再多再美的镜头也就是个不合时宜。是枝裕和离开日本土壤就yw的水平，证明他终究做不了大师。
虽然依然是一部烂片，但挺适合凯奇的；虽然属于残值利用，但价值远低于《成为约翰•马尔科维奇》
凯奇自己拍的很高兴，观众笑他很傻逼，这就够了，还要啥呢？（对了，债也还完了）
我们变了的部分，是因为过去四年发生的种种；而是枝裕和的变化，是他基本将残忍剥离了这个世界。如果说他从前的电影是在拍一个残酷的世界突然变得温暖的瞬间——也只是那么一瞬间——那么这部电影则在拍，世界只是看起来残忍，实际无比温暖。这不免让人怀疑，是否真的如此。
低配版《小偷家族》，奉俊昊打卡上班，姜栋元“忠武路小生”还有很长一段路要走，IU像个AI,说她是戛纳影后有力争夺者真是辱唯了
emmm........老掉牙但还是讨厌不起来Cage（女儿美貌
再次刻画非血缘关系构成的家庭氛围，还是那类能给人带来温暖的残酷成人童话。泪点最高峰是离别前一夜，年轻的母亲在黑暗中跟每一个人道一句生而为人的感谢，拾回每一个角色每一名被戳中的观众那最原初的个体存在的意义。执拗的导演在每一部里反复絮说着底层人的萍水相逢与小小善恶，总是试图在泥淖中捕捉阳光。整场笑声不断，韩国的生活场景看起来好像国内，裴斗娜越来越像科恩嫂。
2.5 作为凯奇粉还是能get到笑点，可是，真的整不出一点新活了吗？
22_088。因为是日本导演拍韩国电影吗，整体显现一种“水土不服”的感觉，没有打动我是真的。公路电影的优点没有出来，裴斗娜一条也是否有点多余？
早期的是枝裕和更多还是偏重东方家庭的慢慢悠长，这几年导演的作品反而更多偏重于社会性议题，特别是小偷家族后更甚。
用很粗的针管笔勾线之后又用很淡的水溶彩铅上色的不协调感。
我不管打低分的人，反正是打动了我，我自己也是到了结婚生子的年龄，但是我没有自信我能做个好爸爸，我有我的苦衷，所以我不结婚生子，这是我对世界最大的责任感，这剧本写得好，演员也演得好
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
