Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
Rather "The Crazy Commoner-became-princess" than "Spencer". A badly written story - it's a series of foreign commoner's presumptions on what it would be like for an American sweetheart's life in prince diana's shoes. The logic of her breakdowns doesn't stand - she knew the way of life before she signed herself in. In short - utter crap.
超级无敌烂，烂到刷新底线！
她真的每一套衣服都好美。她学不会两幅面孔，深陷在痛苦矛盾中，而罪魁祸首的王室只是冷眼看着，还嫌她不本分。
#Venezia 78# 117分钟，从黛安娜回到斯宾塞。K的表演戏剧感挺强，没什么问题
greenwood的配乐实在大赞，爵士搭配古典的复调旋律将观众瞬间拉入影片压抑的氛围，
艺术性炸裂，在《王冠》两季间走钢索，吃珍珠、黑白斯诺克、射鸡野马和线索稻草人，《黑天鹅》般忧美精悚，《鸟人》爵士怎能融进钢琴练习曲。而艺毕，模式化戴安娜还是那套，可怜之人，下半生荣华富贵便宜点？要钱没有要命一条
pretty shit. 表白那会儿我都震惊了
镜头一直怼着小k的脸，是怕观众看不出她糟糕的面部管理和演技吗。
并没有觉得斯图尔特表演用力过猛，她本身就是个比较多元，眼睛里有故事的演员，这段揣摩人物的表演经历应该也挺煎熬吧。虽然是传记题材，但我觉得大可以把这部片看成是具有普世价值的励志片。
查尔斯说：你要学会有两个你，真实的你和有人设的你。
在圣诞假期里，戴安娜意识到她受到了冷暴力的精神凌虐，度假宫殿仿佛已成为囚牢，一想到童年时的快乐时光她就分外想重新得到自由。
片子刚选完角的时候，大家都一众质疑。片子上了，又看到了好多夸奖。抱着怀疑好奇的心态去看，感觉能get导演要的风格，但是就感觉整部片子哪儿哪儿都很拧巴……
the use of jazz is absolutely brilliant
看完给我的感觉“戴安娜”整个人很别扭，不知道是不是王妃本人就是这样，但是看起就是很怪怪的，个人觉得没有剧版的演员更贴切，不过服装还有妆容整体很美的，小k的演技也比之前好很多
但过于碎片化的心理状态描摹却也一定程度上让小k的表演显得零碎而缺乏完整性，脱离于时空与历史整体的人物也始终略微空洞，不过女主提名是板上钉钉，个人也希望能最终获奖
小k神颜神腿一星，服装一星，史诗级灾难配乐
聚光灯都打在她的身上，压得喘不过气。当戴安娜王妃迷路时，所有人都只是看着，没有一只手指向她需要前往的地方。不过至少最后，她和那群雉鸟都逃出了这高高的，隐形的宫墙。小K演得像不像我不敢妄下定论，但我至少知道，她的一颦一笑，都有足够的感染力与说服力。
服化道确实不错 小k演得过于用力 整体流于表面形式 对个人的展现非常单薄
她給孩子們送禮物，有人專門為她做甜品，有人愛她，我都覺得好開心，我的眼淚不停流。她很放肆，但這對她已經很有分寸。
可是就是略略无病呻吟+矫揉造作+神经质+莫名其妙，有点过了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
