性知识3d图片i 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 2007

导演: Simon Ludgate

剧情介绍

  This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
  THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
  Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
  As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

评论:

  • 营怀绿 1小时前 :

    有意思的一点,韩国人死了无事发生,美国人死了立马开庭审判?最恐怖的是,如果胖男的女儿没事的话,结果是不是又是不一样?

  • 福沛凝 5小时前 :

    有一些套路和煽情,但是反转好评。感觉结局略有仓促。

  • 米秀妮 7小时前 :

    给两星确实稍低,但也是片方“招摇撞骗”的结果。这跟之前的误杀完全不是一种东西。2021年了,这种剧情一点悬念都没有,连随便一条社会新闻的力量都不够,电影还在那里自我感动,用了很多自以为张力拉满的慢镜头、特写、一惊一乍剪辑、刺耳噪音声效。全程无法共情,人物就突出一个功能性,这不是误杀,这是自杀,一个悲哀的故事。总结:没有必要拍出来。

  • 馨慧 3小时前 :

    PSS:我说女主播怎么那么眼熟,原来是那战斗力爆棚的牙套妹啊。。。

  • 舒云韶 6小时前 :

    善良一点,祝你和我。

  • 阮乐天 8小时前 :

    故事完整,煽情过度,表演浮夸(女记者太过了,虽然长得还行)。肖央扮相就是减配版范德彪。

  • 独德明 8小时前 :

    完蛋 没想到看了部喜剧片 全场我笑得最大声

  • 费浩思 7小时前 :

    同一天看完这部和女心理师大结局,我觉得我罪不至此

  • 甲靖巧 5小时前 :

    七颗星吧,这种真实事件改编的电影,往往能引起人们的共鸣,只是看演绎的怎么样了

  • 萱锦 2小时前 :

    打俩星是我最后的仁慈!千万不要去电影院看啊!它不配!

  • 蓟瀚漠 3小时前 :

    跟误杀毫无关系的“误杀2”。如果不叫这个片名,可能也不会那么招骂。而且整体质量也完全比不上前作《误杀》,最后的反转也显得没有“惊喜感”。

  • 香楠 0小时前 :

    预告比正片更精彩,正片节奏太慢了。大概最后二十分钟才比较精彩。

  • 祁育强 9小时前 :

    和误杀二字有什么关系?每一步都猜到毫无观影体验

  • 曼锦 1小时前 :

    什么几把啊……陈思诚强大的ego出现了人传人现象

  • 豆寄柔 2小时前 :

    我觉得还行啊,豆瓣网友太上纲上线了吧。起码这是个完整的故事,而且看进去了,不觉得浪费时间!

  • 雅婧 9小时前 :

    慢动作大特写不要钱,电视剧一样的套路拍法,充满陈辞滥调的俩小时。映后有位演员到场,主持人只是让演员聊了几句没让大家提问,今晚最大的慈悲。

  • 欧阳巧蕊 0小时前 :

    这一惊一乍情绪直给的演法(除了肖央)是参考了短视频演法?可有效了是吧。

  • 春心慈 3小时前 :

    完全无感,阶级叙事不接地气,不谈悬疑大搞煽情,非常失败的续集电影。

  • 震骏 8小时前 :

    肖央演得不错,其他演员都emm…逻辑上绕来绕去,我却总是没能很入戏。为sakura姐姐加星!!

  • 莉栀 6小时前 :

    虽然是翻拍的是与《较量》(《误杀》原著)风格截然不同的《迫在眉梢》,但修改了人物背景、社会层面的悲情底和父亲结局的新本子还是沿袭了《误杀》系列的特色——些许喜剧、迷影、黑官以及字面意思的误杀,这些细节的修改共同构成了这场形似神不似的改编。但同样,也正是陈思诚这些重复的创作(尤其是底),让当权者第一次出场的时候就能让观众知晓谜底,这失去了太多的趣味。也许是看过原版的原因,又或许是接踵而至的底的轰炸,最后原版最精彩的部分并没有感受到同样的温柔触感,当然也可能是原版扣动扳机未果的颤抖太过动人。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved