Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
图大耳朵图图那算数我们不论。
太无聊了🥱，东拼西凑的情节。我就纳闷编剧不觉得很尬么？！
今天国庆假期 一早起来匆匆忙忙带孩子走进万达影院看《大耳朵图图》，又一次重温孩子成长过程中经历的种种童心 ，天真无邪可爱。孩子们成立的霸王龙小分队，喜欢拿别人搞不开心的恶作剧，给大家造成困扰麻烦，后来在牛爷爷的影响下，孩子们开始玩“让大家都开心的恶作剧”。他们来到老人之家，为孤老带来欢乐，观看此影片，可以为“调皮”的孩子们也可从中得到启发和欢乐，也让图图继续陪伴孩子们成长，留下本该的童年的记忆！用心思考、用心对待，做个诚实善良的孩子是这部电影突出的主意！
小时候的记忆，不舍得打低分，图图是最喜欢的动画人物啦。
影片里全是原动画片集数拼接起来的，就这还能上影院赚影票钱？？？
7分，第一章节比较喜欢，年轻，现代，女孩，其他章节惨杂的社会意义太多了。
实在是太让我失望了，这个电影我还以为有什么后续的，没想到和原来动画片里的一样，这是在骗观众的钱吗
多加一星给我一直很喜欢的善良温暖可爱搞怪小孩胡图图 (另外：真的想抢走胡图图的小怪)
片尾记录片式的闪回和片头的俯拍对照，在一片蓝色的夕阳余晖中侧过头，开放而丰富的收尾…
上海电影制片厂还夹带私货，最后放了《葫芦娃》《黑猫警长》《邋遢大王》的歌，笑死
从小就喜欢看这个动画，现在长大了还是一样喜欢看，总体来说剧情还好。
你们可气不可气。
都是以前的剧情，1星你值得。真以为之前tv版的受众不看电影，还是可以捂嘴不说话
上影厂应该是带着政治任务来的，来宣传三胎政策，多子多福，从这个制作与剧本来看是比较赶的，就连上映前也几乎没有宣发。小p孩还是可以看看的，但对我这个成年人来说，越南队长胡图图的歌舞属实尬了点。还是TV版好。
十一那天看了个免费的图图
看在图图面子上打三颗星，剧情都是播放过的，毫无创意和新意，就唱了几首霸王龙的歌，要不是喜欢图图一颗星都不想打。
国庆这几个片中，我在影院毅然决然选择了看图图，小怪的配音居然是个中年大叔，让人出戏了😐还有他家不是翻斗花园吗？怎么名字改了？
怎么说呢
好多片段都是动画片里已有的，为了情怀看完了
三分给情怀。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
