Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
电影的情节高潮迭起，很多画面和场景设计都很好看。导演充分在展示男主角的美好容颜，比如说无数次利用男主的侧脸，镜子里的脸，正面的镜头，还有一张枕着一边手臂想问题的那个白背心，全程痴汉。但这个剧情设定的就很屎。男主角真的是一段戏如人生，更甚都不止的故事。自己一个人热火朝天，对方，全程都是玩一玩，即使到了结尾，那个迟疑的不开枪是搞撒子！！！！！！
“快走，我会找到你的。”
故事很完整，能感觉到认真叙述故事！剧情老套偏纪实，警察爹演的很好！警察有点老，cp弱！警察与大学生爱上的莫名其妙，感觉就是利用或泄y吧！冲完整剧情打星吧！2021年的电影画面感觉很久！就是一个真二八经的剧情电影，不要磕cp！
一桩谋杀案背后牵扯出的秘密。“做人不能什么都怕，尤其是害怕自由。”
还不错
除了颜值其他都不在线的一部电影，但有可能这就是爱。
恐同即深柜大概是颠扑不破的永恒真理。看电影学历史。感谢导演搞了个开放式结尾。还有希望。
80年代中期的波兰，离光明已经不远了。社会问题都要靠时间解决么？！
这样真实的历史事件真的是悲哀，只因为性取向就剥夺别人正常生活的权利，乃至于生存的权利，太费解太没有人性了。我只为生活在那个时代的人们感到悲哀，也为没生活在那个时代的自己感到幸运，不过历史就是由前人的错误来驱动转动的，不忘历史。男二标准美人了，且又衷心。男主的心态变换有些不明不白，怎么就弯了爱上男二了，描述的不明白。包含的东西还是挺多的，隐晦的多，不太能看懂。
这是近来看过最好的一部电影，终于没有骂骂咧咧。喜欢这种缓而不慢，该出手时就出手的干净利落，故事不复杂，情感却不经意间出现在每一个镜头中。
做自己不仅仅是性取向，都是爱自己的，还是选了小奶🐶(真相
整个片子基调美丽又绝望，独身一人探查真相，欺骗了所有人，唯独没有欺骗自己。
起始于动人心魄的背景，终止于高开低走的故事。宏观层面的少数族群问题，微观方向的悬疑推案剧情，都算浮泛之谈。虽基于一段政治氛围冷冽且严酷的历史，但影片的视角还是有些狭隘了，批判精神可见一二，奈何这次电影人声讨极端主义的檄文落笔却不够有力。
色调阴冷，节奏紧张，铁幕笼罩下一丝追寻自由的光，挺动人的。P.S.男主的眼睛真好看啊！
節奏奇快，部份情節處理過於商業。比性取向更要扭曲的政治取向。男主今年這部加《Leave No Traces》，同樣借史事反抗體制，人們不會忘記。你走吧，我會找到你。
有时候也不能要求别人做太多，无视默许已经是种幸运。
还有就是画面，太太太美了，太酷，就是那个时期的波兰吧，还有点蒸汽波的感觉
案情交代的不算很清晰，但是能看懂。男主和男二的颜值可以说很配。
美国佬继续搞意识形态输出…不过昏黄压抑的前解体东欧风真的好看啊！
阴郁的波兰让人看的觉得很压抑 故事总体中规中矩 结尾有些怪异 破案的点感觉也很弱
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
